Lady Gaga will turn 35 in March, and she’s, allegedly, giving herself a strict timeline because she’s desperate to become a mom.
According to National Enquirer, there’s nothing else that Lady Gaga wants more than to have babies. Unfortunately, she’s still not engaged to her boyfriend, Michael Polansky.
The “Poker Face” singer previously called Polansky the love of her life. But unfortunately, she still doesn’t have a ring on her finger.
An insider also claimed that Lady Gaga is planning on taking matters into her own hands. And she’s vowed that if she still doesn’t get pregnant at 35, she will find a man who can make her dream come true.
The tabloid then quoted what the singer said in 2013 about having babies. Back then, Lady Gaga said that she’s looking forward to becoming a mother.
But what the tabloid didn’t mention is Lady Gaga’s response when asked what she’s looking forward to the most in her life. While speaking with InStyle, the singer didn’t say that she’s looking forward to having kids. Rather, Lady Gaga said that she’s looking forward to getting married.
The singer also wants to release more music and star in more movies following the success of A Star Is Born. She also said that she’s looking forward to helping more people through the Born This Way Foundation.
Meanwhile, Lady Gaga has also been making headlines regarding her tumultuous relationships. After getting engaged twice, Gaga never had the chance to walk down the aisle.
According to the tabloid, Lady Gaga hasn’t really been lucky in love because every time she’s in a serious relationship, she hopes that it will last but it never does.
This is also, allegedly, one of the reasons why Lady Gaga wants to freeze her eggs. This way, she can have children anytime she wants with or without a partner.
In related news, Lady Gaga also sparked dating rumors with her A Star Is Born co-star, Bradley Cooper. And there were previous claims that the actor got Gaga pregnant.
Last year, Now to Love claimed that Cooper got Lady Gaga and his ex-girlfriend, Irina Shayk pregnant at the same time.
But upon closer inspection, the article tackles the possibility of Cooper getting both women pregnant and it’s not about the actor already getting them pregnant.
The inconsistency is another way to prove that the tabloid’s claims are incorrect.